AI CROSS-FRAMEWORK COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT
One AI Product, Every Framework
Your AI system doesn’t fall under a single law. It sits where the EU AI Act, GDPR, the Cyber Resilience Act, and others overlap — often demanding the same evidence under different names. We assess your product across all of them at once, so you see the whole obligation surface, not a stack of disconnected audits.
A single, lawyer-built assessment of one AI system against the full set of regimes that actually bind it.
WHAT YOU GET
The whole picture, not one regime at a time.
A clear view of how every applicable framework lands on your product — and where they pull in the same direction or against each other.
Every regime that applies, in one map.
We identify which laws genuinely reach your system — EU AI Act, GDPR, CRA, and where relevant DORA, NIS2, the revised Product Liability Directive, or ISO 42001 — and rule out the ones that don’t, so you’re not chasing obligations that were never yours.
The overlaps and conflicts, made explicit.
A high-risk classification under the AI Act, a DPIA under GDPR, and security-by-design under the CRA often hit the same component. We show where one piece of evidence satisfies several duties, and where two regimes genuinely pull apart and you have to choose.
A single ranked picture of your exposure.
Your obligations across all frameworks, gathered into one list ordered by enforcement risk and deadline — so you stop triaging law by law and start with what matters most overall.
You finish with one coherent account of how your AI product is regulated, instead of three or four separate reports that don’t talk to each other. You’ll know what’s genuinely required, what’s double-counted, and what you can safely set aside — and you’ll have it in a form you can defend to any one of those regulators.
WHAT’S INCLUDED
Every framework, one engagement, one record.
A consolidated, audit-ready position your engineers, board, lawyers, and any of the relevant regulators can all work from.
Applicability analysis
Which frameworks reach your product, and which don’t, with the reasoning for each.
EU AI Act assessment
Risk classification, Article 5 screen, role determination, and applicable obligations.
GDPR analysis
Lawful basis, automated decision-making (Article 22), DPIA triggers, and data-minimisation pressure points specific to your AI.
CRA / security analysis
Where your product counts as one with digital elements, its security-by-design and vulnerability-handling duties.
Cross-framework obligation map
A single matrix showing shared evidence, overlaps, and genuine conflicts across every regime in scope
Living Compliance File™
A structured, audit-ready record organised by framework and product stage, built so one artefact can answer to several laws.
About the consultant:(yes, that’s real me)
I’m Yuliia Habriiel. I’ve spent years working directly inside EU digital regulation — not only the AI Act, but GDPR, NIS2, DORA, the Cyber Resilience Act, and ISO 42001 — and I build compliance infrastructure for a living.
The hard part of compliance for an AI product isn’t any single law. It’s that several of them land on the same system at once, overlapping in places and contradicting in others, and most teams meet them one report at a time without ever seeing how they fit together.
Work with me and you get the reasoning regulators actually apply, across every framework that touches your product — assembled into one position instead of a pile of separate opinions.
Who this assessment is for:
- Product teams whose AI system clearly touches more than one regime and who want them handled together, not in silos
- Companies tired of commissioning a separate audit for each law and stitching the results together themselves
- Founders preparing to raise or sell who need a single, coherent compliance position across the board for due diligence
- Deployers and providers unsure where AI Act duties end and GDPR or CRA duties begin on the same product
- Businesses that have outgrown single-issue checklist tools and need joined-up legal judgement
- Non-EU companies — UK, US, Canada — discovering that several EU frameworks, not just one, can reach them through their product
No prior legal training required.
What our customers say:
Thank you for sending the strategy doc. I did not even expect it to be customised so it provides a good strategy tool to help me think about developing my application.
Meredith Godat, PhD
Founder, CogniQuest (Switzerland)
We’ve been trying to figure out how the EU AI Act affects our drone platform, especially around AI-based navigation. The report helped make sense of what actually applies to us and what we need to pay attention to. It gave us a much better picture of where we stand and what we need to do next before expanding into the EU market.
Denis Isakovs,
CTO, ProDrone
(Latvia)
Before this report, every AI Act discussion ended in confusion. Now I can confidently present classification decisions to our legal team and explain timelines to stakeholders. Worth every euro.
Robert Müller
Head of Product, MedicaTech Solutions (Germany)
Backed by Our Guarantee
You leave knowing which frameworks bind your product, how their obligations overlap, and where your real exposure sits — or we keep working until you do, and refund the engagement in full if we can’t get you there. What you’re buying is one clear position across every applicable law. If you don’t have it when we’re done, neither are we.
Audit-Proof Documentation
Lifetime Legal Updates Included
No Legal Background Required
36-Hour Flexible Time Investment
See every framework that binds your AI product — at once
One cross-framework assessment, one coherent position, one record that stands up to any of the regulators behind it.
One-time fee: €4,950
Approximate timeframe: 5 working days
✔︎ Includes lifetime access and legal updates.
Limited slots each month · Typical turnaround in 5 working days
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a cross-framework AI product compliance assessment?
It’s a single legal assessment of one AI system against all the regimes that actually apply to it — typically the EU AI Act, GDPR, and the Cyber Resilience Act, and where relevant others — rather than a separate audit per law. You finish with one consolidated view of your obligations and how they interact.
Why assess across frameworks instead of one law at a time?
Because AI products rarely fall under just one. The same system can be high-risk under the AI Act, processing personal data under GDPR, and a product with digital elements under the CRA — all at once. Handled separately, you duplicate work on the overlaps and miss the gaps between regimes. Together, you see where one piece of evidence covers several duties and where the laws genuinely conflict.
Which frameworks does the assessment cover?
Always the EU AI Act, GDPR, and the Cyber Resilience Act where applicable. Depending on your product and sector, it can also take in DORA, NIS2, the revised Product Liability Directive, the Data Act, or ISO 42001. Part of the work is determining which of these actually reach you and which don’t.
How does GDPR apply to my AI system specifically?
If your system processes personal data, GDPR applies — and AI raises particular issues around lawful basis, automated decision-making under Article 22, when a DPIA is required, and tension with data minimisation. The assessment pinpoints where these bite on your product rather than treating GDPR generically.
Does the Cyber Resilience Act apply to AI products?
Often, yes. Where your AI is delivered as a product with digital elements, the CRA brings security-by-design and vulnerability-handling obligations that sit alongside the AI Act’s own requirements. The assessment establishes whether you’re in scope and what that adds.
We’re outside the EU — can several of these frameworks still reach us?
Yes, and that surprises people. More than one EU regime can apply extraterritorially, so a UK, US, or Canadian company can be caught by the AI Act, GDPR, and the CRA simultaneously through a single product. The assessment maps which ones reach you.
How is this different from just running a tool for each regime?
Tools produce per-law checklists and can’t reason about how the laws interact on your specific system — where evidence is shared, where duties conflict, where one regime’s exemption doesn’t carry to another. This is joined-up legal judgement applied to one product, built to hold up under scrutiny from any of the regulators involved.
What do I receive at the end?
An applicability analysis, individual assessments under each framework in scope, a cross-framework obligation map showing overlaps and conflicts, and a Living Compliance File™ organised so a single artefact can answer to several laws at once.
What does it cost?
A cross-framework assessment for a single AI system is €4,950 and covers every regime in scope. Additional systems are quoted on a short scoping call. No hourly billing, no open-ended scope. no open-ended scope.